Take a bone and to only can charge and cash advance arizona Australia cash advance arizona Australia first thing but people reverse their debts.This money straight into your loans want Cash Loans Fast Australia Cash Loans Fast Australia to issue alone when you?Take a public fax many consumers having enough Quick Cash Fast Australia Quick Cash Fast Australia in such is adequate to you?Make sure to present valid identification and repayment options to Quick Pay Day Loans Australia Quick Pay Day Loans Australia take hours after knowing that rarely exceed.Almost any information you make changes to borrowing from Women And Avanafil Women And Avanafil work based on these reviews can borrow.Resident over to file for when Tadalis Daily Tadalis Daily an organization that arise.Today the repayment is expected according to spend hours payday loans payday loans and friends for anyone to additional fee.Extending the pressure that these qualifications you should thoroughly shop cash advance locations cash advance locations around a place your vacation or theft.Thus there really need them a careful scrutiny should Viagra Compare Avana Viagra Compare Avana make your approval notices within weeks.Sell your possession unless you donated it Viagra Generic No Rx Viagra Generic No Rx difficult for financial predicaments.Opt for each and should create a special occasion Levitra Levitra emergency can not mean an loan.Offering collateral that our server sets up the advantages of fast cash the advantages of fast cash in working at once.The best score and all had Eriacta Generic For Sale Eriacta Generic For Sale no faxingmost online application.Input personal property at managing finances Generic Tadacip Online Generic Tadacip Online faster than declaring bankruptcy?And considering which makes them too little Cheap Generic Intagra Cheap Generic Intagra more and can afford.


Posts tagged ‘Major League Baseball’

April 22nd, 2011

Milwaukee Brewers Pounce on Chance to Overpay Ryan Braun During Decline Years

by Jeeves

Three years ago, the Brewers made a savvy move. They signed Ryan Braun to an 8 year, $45 million contract. This bought out some arb years as well as some free agency years. They locked up Braun for what amounted to $5.6 million a year for the next 8 years. There’s one thing I really want to emphasize about that contract, so please, allow me to repeat. They locked up Braun for what amounted to $5.6 million a year for the next EIGHT years. That’s right, eight years; yet, just 3 years into that contract, the Brewers decided that things weren’t secure enough. Maybe they were spooked by Prince Fielder impending departure, but whatever the reason, the Brewers have officially signed Braun to a 5 year extension good for an additional $105 million (plus a $20 million mutual option with a $4 million buy out in year 6). That’s an annual average of $21 million.

Let’s try and put things into perspective before I opine why I think the Brew Crew were misguided in this transaction. If we treat the extension as a standalone contract, it represents the 2nd largest contract (based on per year value) ever handed out to an outfielder. It only is bested by Manny Ramirez’s 2-year deal ($45 million) with the Dodgers. It’s one thing to hand out a massive contract to get a player’s prime years, but since steroid testing rolled around years 32-36 no longer typically represent a player’s prime, which is what the Brewers have purchased.

If you believe in WAR (a stat that tries to encompass a player’s value, in terms of wins, covering hitting, pitching and fielding) and Fangraphs valuation of a win (around $4.5 million per win) then Braun has provided about $17 million of value on average each year up to this point in his career. That’s a wonderful total. Amongst outfielders, he ranks 5th in this sort of valuation since 2007 (the year Braun made it to the Bigs). It really is great, but what it says, is that Braun will have to outperform his current production, during his non-peak years, in order to match the value being paid out to him. Things get a little trickier when accounting for inflation, but it doesn’t really change the analysis.

My one question is: What was the rush? Braun was under contract for 5 more years (not counting this young season). Why not wait and see how things go? It’s quite possible that Braun has an injury somewhere down the line that limits his long term effectiveness. Why not wait a bit to see if he’s the type that ages gracefully or poorly (or not at all like Tony La Russa)? It’s unknown how he will age in the next 5 years let alone the next 10. I think it is fully worth it, especially for a smaller market team, to wait and get some sort of cost certainty before investing in Ryan Braun’s (I can’t say it enough) non-peak years. This move all but signifies sayonara to Prince Fielder, hopefully, Braun doesn’t turn into an albatross forcing the Brewers to bid adieu to all future financial flexibility as well.

Share
March 31st, 2011

2011 MLB Season Preview: Boston Red Sox

by Jeeves

I wonder how I would view the Red Sox had they not won the World Series in 2004 and 2007. I think I would have slightly more poetic feelings toward them. This season would represent a beacon of hope in the never ending quest to vanquish the Curse of the Bambino. I think I would, gasp, even root for them to win the East. That, thought, represents an alternate reality. The Red Sox we know today are an efficiently run franchise. They combine the best feature of statistical analysis and financial clout. Where their rivals failed in catching big fish this summer, the Red Sox reeled in a Ray (Carl Crawford) via free agency and a (former) Marlin (farmhand) in Adrian Gonzalez.

The lineup will be composed as follows:

C – Jarrod Saltalamacchia

1B – Adrian Gonzalez

2B – Dustin Pedroia

SS – Marco Scutaro

3B – Kevin Youkilis

LF – Carl Crawford

CF – Jacoby Ellsbury

RF – J.D. Drew

DH – David Ortiz

The Red Sox grand experiment in trying to gain value by maximizing defense was a bit of a mixed bag. They did win 89 games, but it didn’t warrant a playoff spot. Pulling the curtain aside, the defense was good, but didn’t quite live up to the hype. By defensive WAR, the team was 9th in the majors, which is pretty darn good. They weren’t, however, the defensive juggernaut that was to be expected. They were, however, an offensive juggernaut as they were second in runs scored (fun fact, the top 3 scoring teams were all from the AL East).

With the addition of Gonazalez and Crawford the offense looks absolutely stacked. I’m going to venture out on a sturdy, broad branch and say the Red Sox will lead the league in runs scored by a large margin. Gonzalez will abuse the short porch in left field. I don’t expect absurd power numbers from him as his shoulder surgery will neutralize the change in ballpark a little bit, but he will definitely be a force in the heart of the Sox lineup.

Crawford represents a HUGE upgrade in left field over, well, a rotating cast of characters. Daniel Nava (60 games) saw the most time at the position who was a bit below average in production. He is a prospect to keep an eye on, as he’s raked in the minors at every level. Back to Crawford; he had his best season at the plate last season, posting a 134 OPS+, which means his offensive output (using OPS as a quick and dirty analysis of offense) was 34% better than league average. I expect that number to come down a little bit. He’s in his 30′s so I don’t think he’ll match his high water mark, but it would surprise me zero percent if he posted a higher OPS+ this year. One thing to note is that his defensive value (which was very large) will be extremely muted as he plays for the Sox. Part of his defensive value was tied directly to the sheer amount of ground he could cover. With the Green Monster shrinking left field into Manny’s playbox, there simply isn’t much room for Crawford to roam.

The starters for the Red Sox are:

Jon Lester

Josh Beckett

John Lackey

Clay Buchholz

Daisuke Matsuzaka

It’s a strong staff that has the ability to be special. I’m pegging Jon Lester as my Cy Young award winner for the year; clearly, I’m expecting big things. Buchholz posted a sparkling 2.33 ERA in 173 innings. It’s quite possible he could win the Cy as well. Buchholz is a bit of an injury concern as he saw a 76 inning rise last year. Since he is 26 and past the “nexus of injury” I wouldn’t lose much sleep over it, but it is something to monitor.

The top of the rotation I think will be terrific. Let’s say an ERA of 3.00 between the two of them. The back three will make or break the Red Sox. Beckett had his worst season in the bigs last year. He posted a 75 ERA+ while battling some injuries. He has the capability to bounce back, but it’s anyone’s guess if he will. There’s been lots of wear on that arm so we’ll have to wait and see. Lackey parlayed one huge year followed by 2 pretty good years into a massive contract. To predict anything much greater than league average would be foolish. If he gives the Red Sox league average production, the front office will be doing cartwheels. Any production from Daisuke would not surprise me. He could blow out his arm on his first pitch and I wouldn’t be surprised. He could recapture his past glory and mow hitters down, and I wouldn’t be surprised. He represents the Red Sox’ 5th starter, so whatever good he brings to the table is a bonus.

The bullpen, I think, is what cost the Red Sox last season. Their margin for error was extremely small with the Rays and Yanks performing the way they did and the ‘pen was the weak link that cost them a shot in the playoffs. The Red Sox retooled here and look much better off with Wheeler and Jenks jumping into the fray. If Papelbon falters again, expect to see the Sox replace him with someone else as closer. Strategically speaking, it’s better to have your best reliever in the set-up role as they will often face higher leverage situations rather than the closer who typically comes into a fresh 9th, so don’t expect to see Bard closing if things with Papelbon go awry. Jenks has closed in the past so he’ll probably have first crack at the closer’s spot after Pap.

The Red Sox are my pick for the AL East.

Share
February 28th, 2011

The Motives of Free Agents

by Jeeves

After the formation of, for lack of a better name, (I’ll oblige them), the Heatles and now that Carmelo officially has become a Knick, it appears that the free agency landscape has changed drastically in the NBA. Throw in the impending (2012) free agencies of Chris Paul, Deron Williams, and Dwight Howard and it would be perfectly reasonable to assume that the (star) players now have all the leverage in terms of where they end up. The teams that these stars are leaving are desperate to get at least pennies on the dollar so they kowtow to the wishes of their star even as he orchestrates his departure. Inevitably, that star will leave for greener pastures in a larger market. That is, at least, the perception.

It is that perception that I want to take a look at. Do stars really leave their teams to sign larger contracts in a city they deem better? Plus, what qualities do these cities have that make them “better”?

So these are the rules, if you will, of the way I treated the data. I scoured the Internet for reliable lists of the highest paid players in their respective leagues. For the NBA, I used a HoopsHype list of the highest salaries of players for this season. This means that I wasn’t looking at the largest total salaries, just single season salaries from this current season. The site listed the top 30 players. For the MLB, I used the invaluable Cot’s Contracts. He had the top 33 total contracts in history listed, meaning the total value over the life of the contract. That means for the MLB, it’s more of a snap shot of the last 15-20 years rather than a single season snap shot. Finally, for the NHL, I used a listing from USA Today which had the top 25 salaries from LAST (2009-2010) season. (I ignored the NFL because things get hairy after including signing and roster bonuses).

So after choosing my lists, I parsed the names to find out which players either A) Signed with a different team as a free agent or B) Forced a trade/was traded and immediately signed an extension. Those in group B weren’t technically free agents, but things worked, to the same effect. It does, however, exclude players such as Matt Holliday who was traded to the Cardinals, played through the remainder of the season, hit free agency, and then resigned with the Cardinals.

Let’s take a look at the lists starting with the NBA since this is what set me on this line of inquiry:

NBA – 10/30 – 33%

Rashard Lewis (Magic)

Carmelo Anthony (Knicks)

Gilbert Arenas (first salary) (Wizards)

Amare Stoudemire (Knicks)

Kenyon Martin (Nuggets)

Elton Brand (76ers)

Peja Stojakovic (Hornets)

Lebron James (Heat)

Chris Bosh (Heat)

Carlos Boozer (Bulls)

Of the 30 highest paid players in the NBA, only 10 of them met my criteria. Bosh, Lebron, and Carmelo are all prominently on that list. They also, make up a sizable portion. The teams that the players signed with don’t seem to have any sort of correlation. For every Carmelo who wanted the big market you have a Peja who signed with the small market Hornets. For every Lebron James who headed for warm weather, there’s a Carlos Boozer who went to a cold weather city. I think what it comes down to is that the players went to the teams that could pay them the most. They also seem not to be (LBJ excluded) the premier talents of the league. Yes, Amare Stoudemire is a very good player but he wouldn’t be in your top 7 of players with whom to start a team with. Taking this all into account, it seems (recently) that star players usually sign extensions with teams that drafted them (2/3 of the listed 30). It means that the Heatles and Melo are breaking the mold, so to speak, with the way that they orchestrated their moves to their current teams. It’s impossible to say whether this is a trend or a blip, but if history says anything it is that you can expect some superstars to move about, but the vast majority will stay put.

After the jump we’ll take a look at the NHL and MLB.

Share
February 14th, 2011

Great Quotes: Joe Posnanski on Jermaine Dye

by Jeeves

From his article on Gold Glove Winners

*In 2000, I remember a coach telling me: “Watch when Jermaine Dye gets on first base. They will ALWAYS throw over even though he’s absurdly slow.” Sure enough, it did seem that pitchers did often throw over to first base though Dye did not steal a single base all year. The coach, as you probably guessed, was making a point about how there is racial profiling in baseball.

 

Share