Take a bone and to only can charge and cash advance arizona Australia cash advance arizona Australia first thing but people reverse their debts.This money straight into your loans want Cash Loans Fast Australia Cash Loans Fast Australia to issue alone when you?Take a public fax many consumers having enough Quick Cash Fast Australia Quick Cash Fast Australia in such is adequate to you?Make sure to present valid identification and repayment options to Quick Pay Day Loans Australia Quick Pay Day Loans Australia take hours after knowing that rarely exceed.Almost any information you make changes to borrowing from Women And Avanafil Women And Avanafil work based on these reviews can borrow.Resident over to file for when Tadalis Daily Tadalis Daily an organization that arise.Today the repayment is expected according to spend hours payday loans payday loans and friends for anyone to additional fee.Extending the pressure that these qualifications you should thoroughly shop cash advance locations cash advance locations around a place your vacation or theft.Thus there really need them a careful scrutiny should Viagra Compare Avana Viagra Compare Avana make your approval notices within weeks.Sell your possession unless you donated it Viagra Generic No Rx Viagra Generic No Rx difficult for financial predicaments.Opt for each and should create a special occasion Levitra Levitra emergency can not mean an loan.Offering collateral that our server sets up the advantages of fast cash the advantages of fast cash in working at once.The best score and all had Eriacta Generic For Sale Eriacta Generic For Sale no faxingmost online application.Input personal property at managing finances Generic Tadacip Online Generic Tadacip Online faster than declaring bankruptcy?And considering which makes them too little Cheap Generic Intagra Cheap Generic Intagra more and can afford.


Archive for ‘Miami Heat’

July 18th, 2012

Current Dream Team vs. the 1992 Dream Team:

by Jeeves

This is a little bit of old news at this point, but Kobe Bryant let it be known that he thought the current version of the Dream Team could beat the original Dream Team. My initial thought was to scoff at him completely; it’s one thing if he wanted to compare the team that was planned for the Olympics, but now that Rose, Dwight, et al there seems to be a sizable gap. Rather than just dismiss it summarily, thought, I decided to take a deeper look at it:

The 2012 team is made up of (grouped by position) Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Russell Westbrook, Kobe, James Harden, Kevin Durant, Andre Iguodala, Carmelo Anthony, Lebron, Kevin Love, Anthony Davis and Tyson Chandler.

(Of note, I’m looking at it from the point of view that were the 2012 players available in the pool picked for the Olympics in 1992, who would make that team. This is a short hand way to figure out which team was better as I don’t have the general wherewithal to break down playing styles right now.)

Now let’s break down the 1992 team. At the top of the heap, you have Jordan. He’s the best player ever and at his peak. He’s obviously still on that team. Bird and Magic, at least in terms of fame, rank just a notch below Jordan and regardless of their respective skill levels at the time (clearly on the downslopes of their career) their fame makes them absolute musts for the team. Those three are safe without a second thought about it.

I’d argue that from a fame standpoint (not even accounting for skills) that Lebron and Kobe rank up there too. So they would make the team too, sheerly  for the sake of “spreading the NBA brand.” Remember, the original Dream Team was there to spread the NBA product more so than to win the gold for America. We’ll get to who they bump off the roster shortly.

So the remaining pool from the 1992ers consists of Malone, Barkley, Stockton, David Robinson, Ewing, Pippen, Mullin, Laettner, Drexler ranked in order of their perceived abilities at the time (e.g. Pippen a few years later would have ranked much higher). From that batch you have Malone and Barkley who were two power forwards at their absolute peaks. Kevin Love is a fantastic player but he isn’t quite up to par with these guys. Yes, his shooting would be nice in the international game, but he has yet to prove himself to be one of the top 20 players of all time as there two were.

Stockton, also, was at his peak. This is where comparing across generations gets a bit dicier. Instinct says the skinny dude in the short-shorts would be no match for CP3, Deron, or Russell. We are, however, used to seeing those three operate in the hand check free NBA of today. Things are horribly skewed toward PGs. So in the 1992 landscape, Stockton wouldn’t be at such a perceived disadvantage. Plus, keep in mind that just about any basketball fan would put Stockton in the top 30 of all time. Just because he doesn’t look like a prototypical basketball player doesn’t mean he’s inferior. Plus, his range would be a welcomed perk of the international game. I will, however, keep CP3 in my back pocket for now. I really like him as a player and think his game would translate well to that time. Westbrook, as much as I love him, strikes me as the player whose game would translate the least.

Then we have the Robinson and Ewing big man pairing. It’s not even worth mentioning Chandler or Davis (at this point) in the same sentence as them, which is why I broke it into two sentences. In any case, keep in mind that David Robinson is criminally underrated. He lost two prime years of basketball development time to serving in the Navy. He put up a 29.8/10.7/4.8 while shooting over 50% from the field; oh and he threw in an extra 3.3 bpg and 1.7 spg. He was tremendously talented and never got his due thanks to Olajuwon and Jordan. Ewing was probably overrated during his playing career because his ceiling was set absurdly high, but I’d argue now that he’s a bit underrated. He was coming slightly off his peak-peak years by 1992, but was still a 7-foot force to be reckoned with; I harp on these two now for the sake of the end of this post…keep reading.

1992 was really the year Scottie started coming into his own. It wasn’t quite his peak, but he managed to put up a 21.0/7.7 rpg/7.0 while shooting over 50% from the field. Very Lebron-esque (27.1/7.2/6.9 for sake of reference). Scottie also has the added benefit of being one of the greatest defenders ever. Lebron, again, for comparison sake is a very good defender, but he’s not yet on Scottie’s level. Pippen managed to walk the line perfectly between locking down his man while also playing free safety when it was defensively sound. Lebron has the tools to match Pippen on the defensive end, but drifts too readily (though Lebron has the added ability of being able to competently defend some PFs). In any case, a younger Pippen definitely makes the team over Iguodala (Pippenish D, mediocre O), Harden (good O, no D), and Anthony (inefficient O, bad D).

Now Mullin is one I don’t fully get. He was a good scorer, but he benefited from playing with those RUN-TMC Warrior teams awhile also playing 40+ minutes; this only served to inflate his offensive stats. To me he was maybe 95% of Tracy McGrady. Or perhaps Vince Carter with a flat top, but no dunks. He’s the first cut from the 1992 team.

I think Mullin represents a pretty good cut line. Drexler made the team because Isaiah was banished by Jordan and because he was sorta-ish MJ-super lite. The Laettner selection made sense at the time. He was Mr. College Basketball, but with hindsight he doesn’t make the cut either.

That gives us three definite cuts in Drexler, Mullin, and Laettner. I would replace them with Durant, Lebron, and Kobe. How convenient! The positions line up. I do like Stockton over CP3, but if it were your team and you picked CP3, I wouldn’t begrudge that selection. That leaves us with a team composed of 8.5 1992 players and 3.5 2012 players. If you had the full complement of (American) players available it would be a bit different, but as Kobe said, this team could beat 1992 which judging by this exercise seems doubtful.

I’ll also throw in that if the two teams were to match up, the current team, without Howard, would have no answer for Robinson and Ewing down low. Chandler’s greatest skill as a defender isn’t in the post, it’s rotating and snuffing out pick and rolls which is doubly important in today’s hand check free game. His defensive strengths aren’t matched up well, at all, with Ewing or Robinson. Plus, he’d a liability on offense.

With handcheck rules in place, Stockton (great defender), Jordan, and Pippen would completely lock down the perimeter. The 2012 team’s greatest strength would be it’s crop of PGs but I think they would be minimized by the rules of ’92 and the aforementioned perimeter defenders. It would be an unbelievable matchup to watch, but I think the 1992 team would take it pretty handily. Plus, do you think there’s any chance Jordan lets his team lose to Kobe? Him and Pip might just make him their Toni Kukoc and humiliate him on the court.

Share
June 22nd, 2012

Congrats to the Heat

by Jeeves

I’m on a business trip right now, so I’ll have more thoughts on the Heat’s title after the weekend, but I just wanted to quickly say that despite all the criticism I’ve heaped on the Heat, they thoroughly deserved this title. It took nearly 2 full years, but this team finally played like I expected them to. Part of the reason (to go along with the Decision and the idiotic staged unveiling) for my criticism of LBJ and the Heatles is that prior to the Thunder series, for whatever reason, they failed to put things together. I’ll get into it in more depth, but the lack of cohesion went beyond just general newness, there was a fundamental flaw that got fixed throughout these playoffs.

Share
June 12th, 2012

10 Thoughts on the Miami Heat-Oklahoma City Thunder Finals

by Jeeves

Kevin Durant

Man, can he shoot. This year he shot just a hair under 50% from the field and 39% from 3 point land. So far in the playoffs, he’s been able to up his shooting to 50.5%. It is obviously imperative that Durant continues to score to effectively negate Lebron James’ output, but his ability to shoot from all spots on the floor will have an added bonus, tiring out Lebron James. Durant may not be as physical as Pierce, but he is unlikely to shoot 34% from the field as Pierce did. This means Lebron will have to expend even more energy ensuring Durant doesn’t have even the smallest shooting window.

Lebron James

LBJ was otherworldly against the Celtics. He averaged 33.6/11.0/3.9 on 52.7% shooting against the Celtics. Despite this, his team was pushed to the brink by the Celtics. Lebron is the last person whom I would question the existence another gear, but I will point out he averaged 45.8 minutes a game in the last series. I’m not sure how Lebron can up the ante, unless he ups his 3 pt shooting from 29% in the last series back up to his 36% shooting from the regular season.

Russell Westbrook

Russ is a prolific volume shooter. Despite shooting a significantly lower percentage across the board and attempting less free throws, Russell has taken approximately the same number of shots as Durant during both the regular season and the playoffs. Talk of him fully embracing his batman role is greatly exaggerated. He may defer a bit more than earlier toward the end of the games, but he still is the wild card for the Thunder. He will single-handedly (and by single-handedly, have a greater than normal influence in a) win a game for the Thunder and cost them a game. I would bet on that; whether he single-handedly wins or loses more games than that, have to be seen.

Dwyane Wade

The only thing exceptional about Wade in the last 5 games of the Celtics series was his whining. This temper tantrum seem familiar (By the way, the foul called was on the rebound by Haslem, Wade pouted on the ground instead of getting back into the play that continued on)

 

In any case, Wade put up a meager 40.8% shooting to go with a pedestrian (for him) 21 ppg. Had Lebron not taken it to another level, the conference finals would be known as the series when Wade let his team down. (Well, at least on this site. The media probably would have just ripped Lebron anyway). My theory is that Wade is nursing an injury. (It was reported he had his knee drained during the Pacers’ series, but it was never confirmed before the rumor spread like wildfire). If the the Heat plan on winning a title, they need Wade to step up big, especially considering they are not facing a decrepit and banged up team like they did with Boston.

Serge Ibaka

It turns out that Ibaka’s career shooting night against the Spurs wasn’t that big of a fluke. Yes, he made a lot of shots, but he isn’t a bad jump shooter. For the year he’s shooting 46% on jump shots 16-23 feet away. Granted it was only 2.6 shots per game from the distance, but that’s roughly what David West provided who is noted for being a good jump shooting, big man. Durant, by the way, shoots the same percentage (on a lot more shots). This means that Miami will have to respect his shot if he slides away from the basket when someone drives or during a pick and roll. If I’m Scott Brooks, I run a lot of screen and rolls with Ibaka on Lebron. This will force Lebron to double down on Durant and leave Ibaka for an open jumper or take him away from the paint where his size can do some serious damage.

Chris Bosh

He is the Heat’s wild card. If the substandard play of Wade continues, the Heat will desperately need Bosh to pick up the slack. Ignoring his freak 3-pt shooting last game (.289 shooter from distance for his career), he has looked a step slow in his comeback. This is 100% expected after missing so much time and, I’m sure, still feeling the effects of the injury. Bosh needs to establish is jumper early, because having Ibaka (or Perkins) out of the lane will make Lebron and Wade’s lives infinitely easier. He’s likely to receive more defensive attention than he did against the Celtics, as the Thunder have more than just Kevin Garnett to protect the paint.

Kendrick Perkins

I really want to say something insightful about Kendrick Perkins, but all I can ever think about is the glorious Sad Perk tumblr.

This ball is heavy...just like my heart

In any case, Perkins is no offensive dynamo, so it’ll be interesting to see what he can do against the likes of Joel Anthony. There’s also concern for end of games as he’s a 60% ft shooter, but an important stopper in the paint.

Mario Chalmers

Wade will probably get the majority of the time guarding Westbrook which will allow Chalmers to float around as he’ll be on the offensively challenged Sefolosha. He was second on the team in steals (3rd per game) so he could prove to be a nuisance on the court.

Thabo Sefolosha

His job is to play great defense on Wade and/or Lebron. He is a liability on offense, though not nearly to the degree as when he was on the Bulls. He shote 44% on 1.7 3′s a game during the regular season. If he can duplicate that at all, it will be a huge plus for the Thunder.

I’ll also point out that James Harden has upped his scoring in the playoffs while also upping his 3 point shooting percentage.

Joel Anthony

I don’t have much to say about Anthony either as he is fairly insignificant. Haslem may actually start in his stead. I’ll make a bold prediction here instead, Thunder in 6. Game 1 and 2 go to the Thunder. Game 3 and 5 go to the Heat. Games 4 and 6 go to the Thunder. With the stupid 2-3-2 format, it’s super important for the Thunder to win their first 2 games if they want to win the final.

Share
May 17th, 2012

Dwyane Wade’s Act is Wearing Thin

by Jeeves

I used to like Dwyane Wade. Local guy, played college ball in the Midwest. Always appeared to play really hard. Seemed to play pretty clean. He made his teammates better. He was able to toe the line and defer to Shaq while still taking the reins and owning that team. There was a lot working in his favor. If you asked me about Dwyane Wade, I probably would have said something along the lines of “Yeah. He’s really good. I wish he was on the Bulls.”

Lately, though, I’m starting to sour on him. I’m not sure when this change started to happen, but he’s really begun to play like an asshole. He preens and argues more than I’ve ever seen before. He flops and whines like nobodies business, and most disturbing of all, he suddenly has a hot temper that flashes (mmm, puntastic) at the drop of a hat.

Game 2 of the Pacers series was pretty emblematic of this new Wade, for whom I don’t terribly care. If Wade doesn’t get his way, he sulks. There was his missed layup at the end of the game. Wade flopped to try and get the call, and then hit the deck. Rather than get back up and foul one of the Pacers after they got the board, he just stayed on the ground and sulked. Then there’s this:

In that clip Wade thinks he deserves a foul called (per usual). In playoff basketball, especially the way that game was being called, there was no way Wade was getting that call. It’s arguable whether or not he would even get that call in the regular season. Rather than keep his anger and ego in check, and just play a little harder to try and take future decisions like that out of the refs hands, he decided to mete out some vigilante justice. Poor Darren Collison didn’t know what hit him.

Some people have tried to defend Wade’s trucking as not that big of a deal. Heck, the NBA didn’t even see fit to upgrade it to a flagrant two. Wade’s lucky, though. He got a superstar call, which would otherwise have probably ended up with a suspension. Compare his hit to a similar one from the regular season:

That looks pretty similar to what Wade did, to me. Smith goes shoulder to shoulder, Wade goes for a forearm instead. The big difference is that Collison bounced right back up and Griffin stayed on the ground much longer. The result of the foul shouldn’t dictate the penalty, the intent should. In my eyes, the intent looks the same. It actually also looks similar to this:

Just like with Collison, Wade didn’t get the respect he wanted from the refs so he decided to take out a prone player. At least with Rip, he had the courtesy to not shove him down from behind.

I’m not sure what’s changed with Wade that has given him such a short fuse, but I wish he’d go back to the more fun Flash from earlier in his career. Dwyane Wade used to be somebody I could cheer for (assuming he wasn’t playing the Bulls), now he just supplies greater reason to cheer against the Heat. Hopefully he figures things out or someone knocks (figuratively) some sense into him, because this act is really wearing thin.

Share
April 24th, 2012

Pay for Play in the Olympics: Mark Cuban Speaks Out

by Jeeves

Mark Cuban as he often does, let his feelings be heard. He rather emphatically voiced his opinion that compensation is deserved for NBA players participating in the Olympics. You may remember that Dwyane Wade stirred up some controversy by suggesting a similar sentiment. Wade declared that NBA players should be paid for playing in the Olympics, before quickly recanting. Cuban, on the other hand, is advocating for compensation to the owner of the team for which the player normally plays. From Cuban’s point of view, he’s in essence loaning out a valued resource to the Olympics so that they may turn a profit. In return, all Cuban gets is nothing at best, injury to his asset at worst. As he says it,

I can’t think of anything more ridiculous and stupid than giving away the best assets from a for-profit business to somebody else to make hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars.

Cuban is quite right that it is stupid to give away an asset for free so that someone else can profit. It’s a kind thing to do, but in terms of business sense, it doesn’t make any. If Dirk Nowitzki gets hurt playing for the German team, Cubes is up a creek. I’m unaware of how it works in FIBA, but I know in the world of soccer that when a player is called for international duty, the international team has to cover that player from the point of view of insurance. If the player gets hurt, the international team’s insurance pays out, not the club team. I don’t know if it works the same way in basketball or not, but that probably represents the maximum return a team owner gets. I don’t fault Cuban for being up in arms over this. Heck, I’m a little annoyed that Derrick Rose will likely be on the Olympic team. After his season, I would like him to get some rest; I can’t imagine how Jerry Reinsdorf, his team owner, feels. The issue, though, is who would provide the recompense to Cuban. The United States Olympic Committee is a non-profit as it is. The money that it conceivably makes off of the Dream Team is funneled towards funding other, less profitable sports (handball, anybody?). NBC, the company that holds the US rights to the broadcast actually lose money (or more likely without funny accounting, break even) on the Olympics. They can hardly afford to pay NBA owner’s on top of their rights’ fees. All that’s really left then are the corporate sponsors, but good luck getting them to pay. As it is, they probably have the view that they’re already funding the team by sponsoring and buying commercial time. After all, that’s what makes both the USOC and NBC their money. Cuban’s position is defensible, but ultimately futile. He’s forced to allow his players to play in the Olympics and has no recourse for repayment. Dwyane Wade, on the other hand, really hold an untenable position. As a player, the Olympics are totally optional. If he wants to play for his country and try for the glory of a gold medal (plus the medal payout) kudos to him. If he wants to stay at home and rest, that’s fine too. Just because he chooses to go doesn’t mean he needs to be compensated. There are thousands of athletes that accept the Olympics for what they are, a chance to showcase your athletic skills against the best in the world for the chance of personal and national glory. The Olympics, to most, are not a profession. It’s an opportunity. NBA players like Wade should treat it as such. Ultimately, all this hot air will probably amount to nothing. The Olympic model is kind of tenuous at the present. If compensation were meted out to the owners and/or players (especially considering the level of compensation I’m sure they would demand) things would break down completely. It would be a losing proposition. It would likely force things back to how they were prior to the original Dream Team; a collection of high school and/or college players. Cuban, I’m sure would be fine with that, Wade, though, probably not.

Share
February 28th, 2012

Derrick Rose: Boring Humblebot or Superstar with his Priorities in Order?

by Jeeves

I don’t particularly care for the All-Star Game. It’s goofy, the players don’t really care, and all, save for the last 5 minutes, is just sloppy, sloppy basketball mixed in with a few neat tricks. After passing the age of, oh, let’s say 15, watching players throw down windmills on 3-0 breakaways has lost its appeal. Despite all of that, though, I still tuned in for the game. It was just about what you would expect. Nobody really cared, til the East staged a furious comeback at the end. Despite the close finish, my favorite moment came before the game even started.

My favorite moment was actually the introductions, for that moment was the absolute essence of Derrick Rose. With bass bumpin’, smoke flowing, and thousands of fans screaming, 4 of the best 10 players in the world (obviously Carmelo is not one of those 4) came to the stage. The 4 to the right, came out swaggering and dancing and screaming. The 5th and shortest of the quartet simply meandered out to the fore with his hands behind his back. Judging by his demeanor and his pace you would think he had just walked out of an exam and was mulling over how he did on the multiple choice section (unless someone was taking the test for him, probably not good).

This is what I absolutely adore about Derrick Rose:

He is all business. He suits up each game with one purpose in mind, to play basketball. He doesn’t care about the theatrics, he doesn’t care about mugging or grabbing the spotlight. He focuses on his game and does his utmost to win. He will throw in a flashy move here and there during the game, but he is pure substance otherwise, whether on or off the court.

I realize that not everybody enjoy that from basketball players. Some people want to be entertained and Rose comes off as a boring humblebot with no character. But watching that .gif above, it’s plain for me to see. I’d much rather have a calm, cool and collected superstar than someone dancing around looking like a jackass. Sure, it’s an all-star game, and it’s meant to be fun, but the actions of all those involved are par for the course. They acted as you would expect based on how they conduct themselves during regular season games.

This actually wouldn’t have come to my attention if it wasn’t for the minor media kerfuffle afterwards. K.C. Johnson of the Tribune asked Rose after the game about his lack of dancing and Rose replied, “I can dance. But there’s a time and place for that. And I don’t think that it was then and there.” He was actually also pressed about the issue prior to last year’s all-star game, and well, I’ll let Rose take it away again:

“I’m not doing that [dancing],” Rose said before Friday night’s game against the Orlando Magic. “I’m … not … doing … that. No, I’m not dancing. They’ll be mad. I’m not doing that. That’s just … Oh my God.”

“I’m going to look silly,” he said. “Then they show that video forever. They show it forever so it’s going to be bad. I hope [I don't have to]. You just made me think about it.”

“It’s just me embarrassing myself,” he said. “That’s something I wouldn’t do. Everybody’s going to be watching, then people are going to be talking about it, tweeting it and facebooking it.”

As charismatic as Lebron is (and though I rag him constantly, he’s undeniably charismatic when suited up to ball), he looks silly dancing and preening next to Rose. I don’t know if it was because I was raised watching Michael conduct himself with a quiet intensity who broke character not to puff his chest out, but to prank and tease friends, but I’m much more drawn to Rose. It’s not just because he’s a Bull. I secretly wish (just for the All-Star Game) that Rose could play with Durant, Love, and Aldridge on the West All-Star team. Those are some of my favorite non-Bulls because of their demeanor and the ferocity with which they work at their craft.

Whether or not you think of Rose as a basketball playing drone or as someone to look up to, he was definitely the highlight for me during the All-Star game

Share
February 1st, 2012

Ease off the Gas on the Griffin over Perkins Dunk Hyperbole

by Jeeves

Look, Blake Griffin’s dunk over Perkins was awesome. It was so good, Perk actually ended up deleting his twitter account. Presumably he was being ridden so hard by the entirety of the world, he had to get rid of it. Let’s keep things in perspective though. Yes, Griffin’s dunk was baller, but let’s not overrate things just because it happened this past week. Without having to dig too deeply, here are a few dunks better that was Blake did:

Well, here’s Blake’s dunk, first,  to compare:

Nice height, nice explosion, but he’s basically moving straight up. He barely gets to the rim at all. Compare that to Pippen:

That is a thing of beauty. Pipper goes THROUGH Ewing. A legitimate 7 footer in his prime. Not only does he go through him, but Pip then towers over the fallen Ewing, shows him his balls, and then talks smack to Spike Lee. You can’t tell me Blake’s dunk was better that that. If that happened today, Ewing would delete his twitter, close down his facebook, throw away his cellphone and orchestrate a trade to Seattle…yes Seattle, with no team there, no one would expect to see a pro basketball player.

Here’s another massive dunk THROUGH the defender. Varajao just shrivels into a heap at the base of the basket:

Hell, even Taj’s dunk last year in the playoffs over Wade was better:

So while Blake’s dunk was cool, let’s keep things in the right context. It was one of the best of this season, but not one of the best of all time.

Share
August 16th, 2011

Breaking Down the Video of an Asian Kid Stealing the Ball from Lebron and then Dunking on him

by Jeeves

So this video surfaced late yesterday. It looks like Lebron has taken his talents to East Asia. Unfortunately for him, this apparent promotional game for Nike became a whole lot more memorable after number 31 on the red team stole the show. Let’s break this video down.

0:00 – 0:06 – Things are a bit sloppy. It seems to be a common thread throughout this clip. Eventually the ball finds its way to Lebron.

0:06 – 0:12 – Lebron flashes his handles a little bit. His defender stands his ground. At this point, it seems inevitable that Lebron will through in one good crossover and leave the kid sprawled on the floor.

0:12 – 0:14 – Lebron goes behind his back, but pushes the ball out too far. Like I said, sloppiness runs pretty rampant through this clip. This is the crucial instant of the clip as it opens up the window for 31 to steal the show.

0:14 – 0:16 – Number 31 seizes his window of  opportunity to swipe at the ball. Lebron has to take an extra high dribble to try and recover from the behind the back move which allows the defender to knock the ball loose and charge up court. Again, at this point it looks like he’s getting set up for a come from behind block by Lebron.

0:16 – 0:19 – The kid loads up and suddenly flies through the air. I did NOT see this coming, at all. He dunks the ball home as Lebron swings at the ball from behind.

0:19 – 0:21 – Smoke starts shooting from the backboard. I think all NBA teams should adopt this. It would increase the awesomeness of each NBA game by roughly 13%.

0:21 – 0:25 – Lebron grabs the ball and starts pelting up the court. He throws in a little body fake around half court and again goes behind the back.

0:25 – 0:29 – Again, the move is sloppy and he ends up taking another high, recovery dribble that gets away from him. He jumps in the air and is forced to try and toss it into the corner. Unfortunately, the ball goes out of bounds. Having the ball stolen and getting dunked on, but this has to be the more embarrassing bit for LBJ. He clearly wants the ball to try and reassert his dominance on the court and only manages to screw things up more. Kevin Durant at rucker, this is not.

0:29 – 0:41 – The ball gets passed around by the red team. Lebron stands kinda in no man’s land. Just errantly trying to swipe the passes overhead. If you pause at 41 seconds, you can already tell what going to happen.

0:42 – 0:43 – Lebron’s nemesis gets the ball on the wing behind the 3-pt line. He has all kinds of space and time. Lebron takes one shuffle towards him, but the kid is still wide open.

0:43 – 0:48 – Rise and fire! 3 pts, more smoke, and the greatest minute span of that kids on-court life.

For all we know, outside of this short clip, Lebron did a backflip while dunking the ball. Dude is pretty amazing at basketball. It’s too bad for him that he left his concentration lapse so thoroughly during the length of this clip. It’s a bit of a microcosm for his NBA game as well. All I know, is if I were an NBA player playing in an exhibition, I would do my darndest to not get embarrassed, knowing full well that if I do get caught looking silly, they’ll definitely be a cell phone camera waiting to catch me in action.

 

Share
July 5th, 2011

Debating the NBA Lockout: The Case for the Players

by npiller88

Financial risk is part of doing business in the NBA. If you buy the Cleveland Cavaliers, you better be ready to lose some money, especially in a down economy. Dan Gilbert (owner of the Cavs), still whining over the absence of Lebron, is actually an extremely lucky small market team owner, since he had a superstar for several years.

We know what the issues are here: small market owners (the majority in the NBA) are pitted against the players union and some large market owners on salary cap and free agency rules. The current NBA landscape is heading more in the direction of professional baseball, with a few marquee franchises in major markets (Yankees, Red Sox, Phillies), rather than the NFL (which is structured to ensure competitiveness of small market franchises). The NBA loves it some Heat, Lakers, Knicks, Celtics and Bulls, but when most other teams are losing money, it’s incumbent upon the ownership as a collective to restructure the league in order to seek profits.

Or is it?

Why are NBA owners trumpeting “profitability” ad nauseum? Aren’t they mostly billionaires who bought a team as a toy? If they aren’t then they probably shouldn’t be in this business to begin with.

There’s a reason why NBA players have the highest average annual salaries of any professional athletes: There are so few of them–only five in a starting lineup, and about 15 or so on a team. Toss in a few transcendent stars that not only lead their teams to victory but sustain a ceaseless hype machine that generates fan interest and puts butts in the seats, and you have an extremely well-compensated set of employees, on average.

Look at Blake Griffin–still on his rookie contract, so he’s not much of a burden to devil incarnate owner Donald Sterling, and yet he has made Clippers games the second-hottest ticket in town (still second fiddle, thanks to LA’s beloved Kobe and the Lakers). Ticket prices for the Clippers have skyrocketed, and there’s no doubt that the value of the franchise has risen as well.

The point is, NBA teams rely on big stars. Maybe that’s why owners like Gilbert are so peeved over the free agency rules as they stand. But how are you going to prevent stars from selecting their city of choice once their original contract expires? To force a player to stay in his market of origin, or to establish a hard salary cap that prevents elite players from congregating is, dare I say.. anti-American. Players shouldn’t be encumbered in such ways once their contracts expire. Isn’t that the meaning of the term “free agent?”

Perhaps only major market teams are capable of spending enough to take on multiple max contracts (I’m looking at you, Heat, Knicks, and Celtics). In that sense, one can understand the struggles of the Dan Gilberts of the world. His team will never be able to compete for free agents. But if the solution is a hard cap, owners (who are already obscenely wealthy, and more so than even the wealthiest players) will be manipulating the market to lower average player salaries (not just for superstars like Lebron and his ilk). This is why you have very little infighting among the players union on lockout issues, and a whole mess of it among the owners. Players know a hard cap is a bad deal for them, from Kobe down to the 14th man.

And how did player salaries rise to their current level (which small market owners would describe as unsustainable)? Owners wrote the checks. With players like Andris Biendrins making 10 million a year, most owners have no one to blame but themselves. Smaller markets are capable of succeeding with savvy drafts, innovative coaching, and player development (San Antonio, Houston anyone?). So whiny rich guys like Gilbert want to establish a profit-ensuring structure, even though they’ve been willing to spend big money on players in the past? Sounds hypocritical and meddling.

As much as I would like to avoid the top heavy system typified by Major League Baseball infiltrating the NBA, owners need to recognize that players get paid astronomical salaries because someone decided they were worth it. Sure, major market teams can afford to lay money on the line and take bigger financial risks, but sports team ownership has never been a fail-safe business venture. In most cases, it’s been more about the fun than the money. A case could be made for further limiting the amount of max contracts a team can take on (so as to avoid the formation of superteams like the Heat that many owners consider toxic to the league), but a hard salary cap is just punishment to the players as a whole.

I hate top-heavy leagues, but not as much as I hate greedy billionaires who take away my basketball because they aren’t making “a profit.”

Share
June 14th, 2011

Why a Heat Loss is Good for the NBA

by npiller88

So, the NBA Finals end in anticlimactic fashion, with the neo-juggernaut Miami Heat crumbling under the pressure of the fourth quarter, with much of it having been applied on the weak-willed stems of Lebron James.

James’ post-series comments (on haters: “They got the same personal problems they had today. And I’m going to continue to live the way I want to live and continue to do the things I want to do.”) added a touch of nouveau riche smug to the existing collage of vulnerability and egoism.

But at this point, where can James go but up? The story line for next season is set: The Heat out to reclaim pride and glory.. who will stop them? A stern critic of theirs’ all year, I found myself pulling for the Heat late in the fourth quarter of game 6. I may be annoyed with their arrogance, but I love to watch athletic feats of incomparable brilliance, which is why I love to watch the NBA (and Lebron James, for that matter). The way things ended left an emptiness in my stomach. Maybe it was the hype-machine’s sensationalizing during these playoffs that left me feeling unquenched after expectations reached the level of Miami humidity.

Now, the Heat will retain their haters, but gain a few new adherents. It’s only natural: The Heat will now dig themselves out of a grave. Who wants to keep heaping dirt on that pile?

Even with the implications that a super team has for small NBA markets everywhere, no true NBA fan wants to bury these Heat next year. If James chokes every year, there will be no story. Fans will lose interest. It’s fun to knock these egomaniacs down a few pegs here and there, but foils like James and Wade on the Heat are rare and precious.

My heroes to their foils? How about Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook? Oklahoma City Thunder v. Miami Heat, coming soon.

And David Stern counts his money.

Share