Take a bone and to only can charge and cash advance arizona Australia cash advance arizona Australia first thing but people reverse their debts.This money straight into your loans want Cash Loans Fast Australia Cash Loans Fast Australia to issue alone when you?Take a public fax many consumers having enough Quick Cash Fast Australia Quick Cash Fast Australia in such is adequate to you?Make sure to present valid identification and repayment options to Quick Pay Day Loans Australia Quick Pay Day Loans Australia take hours after knowing that rarely exceed.Almost any information you make changes to borrowing from Women And Avanafil Women And Avanafil work based on these reviews can borrow.Resident over to file for when Tadalis Daily Tadalis Daily an organization that arise.Today the repayment is expected according to spend hours payday loans payday loans and friends for anyone to additional fee.Extending the pressure that these qualifications you should thoroughly shop cash advance locations cash advance locations around a place your vacation or theft.Thus there really need them a careful scrutiny should Viagra Compare Avana Viagra Compare Avana make your approval notices within weeks.Sell your possession unless you donated it Viagra Generic No Rx Viagra Generic No Rx difficult for financial predicaments.Opt for each and should create a special occasion Levitra Levitra emergency can not mean an loan.Offering collateral that our server sets up the advantages of fast cash the advantages of fast cash in working at once.The best score and all had Eriacta Generic For Sale Eriacta Generic For Sale no faxingmost online application.Input personal property at managing finances Generic Tadacip Online Generic Tadacip Online faster than declaring bankruptcy?And considering which makes them too little Cheap Generic Intagra Cheap Generic Intagra more and can afford.

September 5th, 2012

Andy Roddick: Overachiever and Hall of Famer

by Jeeves

Andy Roddick has announced his impending retirement. His current match against Juan Martin del Potro has been suspended until the morning. This very well could be the last we see of Roddick on the ATP. Whether he wins or falls, his legacy as an overachiever and as a Hall of Famer are set.

Let me first address that latter point. Tennis Hall of Fame standards are quite low; we’re not talking about the baseball Hall of Fame. Despite that, Roddick still, clearly, makes it in. He had the requisite slam, and spent a couple months as the number 1 player in the world. He was quickly displaced by Roger Federer, but remained number 2 in the world for the vast majority of the year. He spent roughly 9 years in the top 10. He won 32 singles titles, ranking him 20th all time in the Open Era. That’s quite a resume. Think of him as a baseball compiler. It was a nice career, with an extended mid-level peak. He may not be Bob Gibson, but he could be Bert Blyleven.

That actually brings me to his second characteristic. Andy Roddick did damn well to put up that career. I think sports media and American fans were jaded by the success of the Sampras-Agassi-Courier years. Tennis has become much more global and the US’s place in the game has fallen greatly. Simply being the best American doesn’t guarantee Grand Slam success as it seemingly did before. It also doesn’t help that Roddick ran into the Federer-Nadal buzz saw. Those two could very well end their careers as the best 2 players of all time. It’s like Karl Malone in the NBA. He was a great player, but had the misfortune of running into the brilliance of Michael Jordan. He made two finals and gave MJ a good run for his money, but ultimately, wasn’t in the same class. There’s no shame in falling short of a sport’s all-time greatest; it doesn’t signify underachievement.

If you really break down Roddick’s game, he didn’t have a whole lot of tools. Since I’ve borrowed liberally from other sports, think of it in terms of golf. He had a great driver (his howitzer of a serve) and handled his woods well (forehand), but there was a lot left to be desired with his irons (backhand) and putting (overall technique). Roddick, unlike, Federed wasn’t blessed with a full complement of clubs, he made the best of what he had. Yes, it meant running around backhands, on many occasions, but it ultimately led to results. And when he fell short, he didn’t just pack it in and say that was my best; he sought out new coaches and technology to try to squeeze out every ounce of his ability.

That devastating loss to Federer in the Wimbledon finals was a sort of microcosm for his career (once Fed figured it out). Andy was clearly working so hard, and he was absolutely maxed out that day in terms of his play. Despite that, and going into the 30th game in the 5th set, Federer seemed in control, he just was better. The fact that Roddick couldn’t eek out one more break doesn’t diminish performance, much as the loss in that final doesn’t diminish his career. It stands as a testament to a guy that really gave it his all, no matter the odds and frankly, despite some of his on court antics, that’s something to look up to.

Share
August 21st, 2012

Oklahoma City Thunder Lock in Future Plans with Ibaka Signing

by Jeeves

GM Sam Presti inked Serge Ibaka to 4-year, $48 million extension. The Thunder are now committed to paying Durant, Westbrook, and Ibaka just a hair under $44 million come 2013-2014. Throw in Kendrick Perkins and that figure jumps up to $52 million. Prior to this extension, a lot of people have been left wondering how the small market Thunder will handle the contracts of the core 4. The consensus seemed to be that Harden would definitely get his extension with Ibaka remaining as the loose end. Just because it happened the other way around, doesn’t necessarily spell and end for Harden in a blue jersey.

The Thunder still maintain some good flexibility with regards to the cap and the luxury tax. They, obviously, can try and extend Harden. His price is tough to predict at this point. I’m confident he would command a max salary on the open market, especially with Dallas and Houston able to clear (more than enough) cap room, but it’s quite possible that he signs for less. If he wants to stay with OKC, the odds are he won’t be offered a max contract. Westbrook wasn’t offered the max and he had been a starter for the team. It’s also questionable, financially, for OKC to extend a full max offer.

If Harden is determined to get the largest contract possible, OKC can still make it work. Clay Bennett can just suck it up and pay all the luxury tax fees and hope to reel in a title in the process. The Thunder can also amnesty Kendrick Perkins or Nick Collison. The former will be harder to let loose now that Dwight Howard and the Lakers stand between the Thunder and a return to the finals.

The other option, which isn’t necessarily being talked about is to stand pat for now and reevaluate at the end of the season. They just locked Ibaka into what could prove to be an under market deal. Ibaka is a pretty darn dynamic on defense and has grown in leaps and bounds on the offensive side. He put up some sterling shooting performances in the playoffs, which may have been a little anomalous but are indicative of his offensive growth. The Thunder do retain the right to trade Ibaka after 6 months. The Thunder could realistically use the beginning of the season to evaluate both Ibaka and Harden and then proceed to trade one of them. I’m sure many who missed out on Howard would be eager to try and trade for Harden.

Ultimately, I think the Thunder will keep their core 4 together. Unless you’re Chicago, you don’t break up a championship caliber team for luxury tax concerns. The Thunder’s team will be locked in for the foreseeable future (barring trades, of course) and it will be interesting to see how they match up against the Lakers and Heat moving forward.

Oh, and just because:

Share
August 7th, 2012

Thoughts From the Brain of Jeeves: The Houston Astros, in Summation

by Jeeves

I realize the Astros are bottoming out so that they can rebuild. Hey! It worked for the Natinals (sic). Regardless, this pretty much sums up their season to date:

 

The video clip might just be better than the above still:

http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=23685139&topic_id&c_id=mlb&v=3&tcid=fb_video_23685139

Share
August 7th, 2012

Thoughts from the Brain of Jeeves: Olympic Frame of Reference

by Jeeves

It struck me this past week while watching some Phelpsian performances during the swimming events that I no longer have a frame of reference for how good these athletes are. It struck me the hardest during the breast stroke. It’s an awkward looking event and the racers appear to not be moving all that quickly. I realize and appreciate that they move far faster in the water than I could ever dream, but it just doesn’t look that way.

My solution is that the pool should have an extra lane and in that lane should be a completely average swimmer. With that swimmer there, getting blown away by the Olympians, we all could fully comprehend how gifted these athletes are. Heck NBC/IOC could make it a contest. The winner (provided they can competently complete the task) then gets flown out and get to hang in the Olympic Village just like a real athlete. And I don’t mean some idiot that’s never swum before, but someone who was maybe a moderately talented high school swimmer. So I ran cross country/track in middle school to keep in shape between my main sports. I was totally decent. I would be the type that should run against Usain Bolt in the 100m. Then when he edges out the likes of Yohan Blake and I’m still 15m from the finish people can understand, oh yeah, he’s really, really, really fast.

Unfortunately this wouldn’t work for all sports. Something like volleyball would be tough to do. Yeah, two high school teams could play each other, but it wouldn’t give the right effect. It would have to stick to (team races) and individual sports.

Share
August 6th, 2012

Thoughts from the Brain of Jeeves

by Jeeves

Well I’ve moved into my new apartment. Unfortunately, my stuff isn’t all put away yet. I’ll be working on that this coming week and the site should return back to normal beginning next week. Until then, since I’ve been so neglectful, check back everyday for freer form posts detailing some half baked (or even fully baked ideas).

Share
July 23rd, 2012

Personal News

by Jeeves

I know posting has been erratic here and I’ve actually gotten a few e-mails seeing whats up. I apologize for the inconsistency. I will actually be moving to another city at the end of this week so life has been hectic dealing with all that comes with a move. So please bear with me. Once I’m settled, I’ll get back to my 3-4 posts per week. I promise!

 

Cheers,

Jeeves

Share
July 19th, 2012

The Unintended Victim in Jeremy Lin Saga: MSG Stock Price

by Jeeves

Presented without comment:

A) Lin has his first big game

B) Lin dominates vs Kobe and the Lakers

C) Rockets offer Jeremy Lin a backloaded contract.

Share
July 18th, 2012

Current Dream Team vs. the 1992 Dream Team:

by Jeeves

This is a little bit of old news at this point, but Kobe Bryant let it be known that he thought the current version of the Dream Team could beat the original Dream Team. My initial thought was to scoff at him completely; it’s one thing if he wanted to compare the team that was planned for the Olympics, but now that Rose, Dwight, et al there seems to be a sizable gap. Rather than just dismiss it summarily, thought, I decided to take a deeper look at it:

The 2012 team is made up of (grouped by position) Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Russell Westbrook, Kobe, James Harden, Kevin Durant, Andre Iguodala, Carmelo Anthony, Lebron, Kevin Love, Anthony Davis and Tyson Chandler.

(Of note, I’m looking at it from the point of view that were the 2012 players available in the pool picked for the Olympics in 1992, who would make that team. This is a short hand way to figure out which team was better as I don’t have the general wherewithal to break down playing styles right now.)

Now let’s break down the 1992 team. At the top of the heap, you have Jordan. He’s the best player ever and at his peak. He’s obviously still on that team. Bird and Magic, at least in terms of fame, rank just a notch below Jordan and regardless of their respective skill levels at the time (clearly on the downslopes of their career) their fame makes them absolute musts for the team. Those three are safe without a second thought about it.

I’d argue that from a fame standpoint (not even accounting for skills) that Lebron and Kobe rank up there too. So they would make the team too, sheerly  for the sake of “spreading the NBA brand.” Remember, the original Dream Team was there to spread the NBA product more so than to win the gold for America. We’ll get to who they bump off the roster shortly.

So the remaining pool from the 1992ers consists of Malone, Barkley, Stockton, David Robinson, Ewing, Pippen, Mullin, Laettner, Drexler ranked in order of their perceived abilities at the time (e.g. Pippen a few years later would have ranked much higher). From that batch you have Malone and Barkley who were two power forwards at their absolute peaks. Kevin Love is a fantastic player but he isn’t quite up to par with these guys. Yes, his shooting would be nice in the international game, but he has yet to prove himself to be one of the top 20 players of all time as there two were.

Stockton, also, was at his peak. This is where comparing across generations gets a bit dicier. Instinct says the skinny dude in the short-shorts would be no match for CP3, Deron, or Russell. We are, however, used to seeing those three operate in the hand check free NBA of today. Things are horribly skewed toward PGs. So in the 1992 landscape, Stockton wouldn’t be at such a perceived disadvantage. Plus, keep in mind that just about any basketball fan would put Stockton in the top 30 of all time. Just because he doesn’t look like a prototypical basketball player doesn’t mean he’s inferior. Plus, his range would be a welcomed perk of the international game. I will, however, keep CP3 in my back pocket for now. I really like him as a player and think his game would translate well to that time. Westbrook, as much as I love him, strikes me as the player whose game would translate the least.

Then we have the Robinson and Ewing big man pairing. It’s not even worth mentioning Chandler or Davis (at this point) in the same sentence as them, which is why I broke it into two sentences. In any case, keep in mind that David Robinson is criminally underrated. He lost two prime years of basketball development time to serving in the Navy. He put up a 29.8/10.7/4.8 while shooting over 50% from the field; oh and he threw in an extra 3.3 bpg and 1.7 spg. He was tremendously talented and never got his due thanks to Olajuwon and Jordan. Ewing was probably overrated during his playing career because his ceiling was set absurdly high, but I’d argue now that he’s a bit underrated. He was coming slightly off his peak-peak years by 1992, but was still a 7-foot force to be reckoned with; I harp on these two now for the sake of the end of this post…keep reading.

1992 was really the year Scottie started coming into his own. It wasn’t quite his peak, but he managed to put up a 21.0/7.7 rpg/7.0 while shooting over 50% from the field. Very Lebron-esque (27.1/7.2/6.9 for sake of reference). Scottie also has the added benefit of being one of the greatest defenders ever. Lebron, again, for comparison sake is a very good defender, but he’s not yet on Scottie’s level. Pippen managed to walk the line perfectly between locking down his man while also playing free safety when it was defensively sound. Lebron has the tools to match Pippen on the defensive end, but drifts too readily (though Lebron has the added ability of being able to competently defend some PFs). In any case, a younger Pippen definitely makes the team over Iguodala (Pippenish D, mediocre O), Harden (good O, no D), and Anthony (inefficient O, bad D).

Now Mullin is one I don’t fully get. He was a good scorer, but he benefited from playing with those RUN-TMC Warrior teams awhile also playing 40+ minutes; this only served to inflate his offensive stats. To me he was maybe 95% of Tracy McGrady. Or perhaps Vince Carter with a flat top, but no dunks. He’s the first cut from the 1992 team.

I think Mullin represents a pretty good cut line. Drexler made the team because Isaiah was banished by Jordan and because he was sorta-ish MJ-super lite. The Laettner selection made sense at the time. He was Mr. College Basketball, but with hindsight he doesn’t make the cut either.

That gives us three definite cuts in Drexler, Mullin, and Laettner. I would replace them with Durant, Lebron, and Kobe. How convenient! The positions line up. I do like Stockton over CP3, but if it were your team and you picked CP3, I wouldn’t begrudge that selection. That leaves us with a team composed of 8.5 1992 players and 3.5 2012 players. If you had the full complement of (American) players available it would be a bit different, but as Kobe said, this team could beat 1992 which judging by this exercise seems doubtful.

I’ll also throw in that if the two teams were to match up, the current team, without Howard, would have no answer for Robinson and Ewing down low. Chandler’s greatest skill as a defender isn’t in the post, it’s rotating and snuffing out pick and rolls which is doubly important in today’s hand check free game. His defensive strengths aren’t matched up well, at all, with Ewing or Robinson. Plus, he’d a liability on offense.

With handcheck rules in place, Stockton (great defender), Jordan, and Pippen would completely lock down the perimeter. The 2012 team’s greatest strength would be it’s crop of PGs but I think they would be minimized by the rules of ’92 and the aforementioned perimeter defenders. It would be an unbelievable matchup to watch, but I think the 1992 team would take it pretty handily. Plus, do you think there’s any chance Jordan lets his team lose to Kobe? Him and Pip might just make him their Toni Kukoc and humiliate him on the court.

Share
July 12th, 2012

Raptor Riot: Mascot Mishap

by Jeeves

Oh man, around the 9 second mark just killed me.

Share
July 11th, 2012

Swimmer Thinks Phelps Doesn’t Try, Probably Thinks Gretzky Got by on Pure Talent, too

by Jeeves

Olympian Tyler Clary has officially made a name for himself. He’s called out Michael Phelps for, well this is a portion of what he said:

The fact that he doesn’t have to work as hard to get that done, it’s a real shame,” Clary told the paper. “I think it’s too bad. You see that all too often, where you get athletes that are incredibly talented that really take it for granted. I think the things he could have done if he’d worked as hard as I do would have been even more incredible than what he has pulled off.

I think we can all agree that Phelps is a prodigious swimming talent. There’s a reason he won freaking 8 gold medals in Beijing. Clary, though, is selling him thoroughly short. It’s farcical to think that someone can pull off that type of performance in such a varied group of swims against specialized competition without working at it.

I’ll concede it’s possible Phelps doesn’t quite have the eye of the tiger as he did last time around. That’s completely normal. He conquered every obstacle, he bested every challenge and was/is at the pinnacle of his sport. Hell, even Michael Jordan, a pathological competitor took a sabbatical to play baseball due to lack of fire. When you have no challenges left, your focus tends to wane.

Despite that, though, Phelps has remained dominant. Yes, Lochte bested him in one of the trials, but he qualified for the Olympics for another shot a 8 meals, again. How much better do we need to expect of him? Unless Clary was secretly trying to motivate Phelps, you better believe he’s going to get smoked in the pool in a few weeks as he will go head to head with Phelps in the 200m butterfly. (I will point out, also, that Clary didn’t qualify for the 400 IM, his best event. Perhaps he should have trained harder rather than coasting on his athletic gifts, or at least asked Phelps for some pointers as he qualified for the race).

Share